Archive for » November, 2008 «

Thursday, November 20th, 2008 | Author: The Gnome

So I promised you a fiber post. And here it is.

I haven’t had near the amount of time for spinning that I would like. I have a deadline fast approaching. If I meet it, I get to start writing my dissertation. If I don’t… well… lets not think about that.

But I have had some time for dying. Been messing with a few new techniques.

Here’s one that didn’t even get a name, or get put up on the site before it sold! [Edit: I have been, correctly, informed that I did name it. Due to the way it looked when first dyed, this roving was named "Frog Guts." Pleasant, huh? ::grins::]
Sold Roving

And, using a modification of that method, “Autumn Serendipity” which is now up in the store. I like what I can do with semi-blended color.
Autumn SerendipityAutumn Serendipity

It should allow for some interesting yarns with a unified project “color” but still variegated local color. Essentially a multi-color vesion of a semi-solid. This one, “Soft Serendipity” I’ll be spinning myself (for the site), since the roving got pulled apart during washing so it’s not braidable.
Soft Serendipity

Then I decided to try using the method I used for the Mother of the Twelve Moons yarn Twelve Moons on roving, instead of yarn.

Not as predictable a result on roving, but I think I’m figuring it out, and I got some cool effects.

“Sweeney Todd” (yes, the Demon Barber, but if you prefer, Nightmare before Christmas). Up on the site.
Sweeney ToddSweeney Todd

And, the first of two or three roving pieces for yet another Mythic yarn, “Yingarna” using the same method.
Yingarna Ply One

That’s all the new fiber for now. Except for the roving for a new yarn, “Moss Agate.” But I’m keeping that one under wraps for now.

And, totally unrelated to anything fiber (unless that’s what you search for), Google has teamed up with LIFE to bring, all of LIFE’s photos since 1970

~The Gnome
Gnome

Category: Yarn Update  | Tags: , , ,  | 2 Comments
Wednesday, November 19th, 2008 | Author: The Gnome

::waves:: Hi! I’m not dead yet.

I counted several thousand yeast yesterday (13 hours, woot!). And will do so again today, in between a lab inspection, making MORE yeast to count, and measuring protein concentration in still more yeast.

But, in the evening, I finally finished… the sock. And I did promise you a post about knitting and fiber, didn’t I?

You see, in April, I learned to knit, thanks to the wonderful women of my Knit Night. Because I’m like that, I decided to start with a pair of socks. Note this is not the sock of doom, but in fact, a sock (Thuja) that showed up on The Yarn Harlot’s blog (I’m the one in the kilt near the end of the post). That pair of socks came out just fine.

My First Knitting

My First Knitting

For my second knitting project I did a scarf, the One-Row Scarf by the Yarn Harlot with my first handspun, so why not try something harder?

Well the first problem was that I wanted to make socks for Dad. But not just plain socks. I wanted a little ornamentation, but the socks still had to be masculine and wearable. Hrm. So I got some Wildfoote sock yarn in Tom Cat, and searched for patterns in my new Sensational Knitted Socks book (Charlene Schurch) and found a nice, “looks like cables” pattern, ok some new techniques, toe up, cool… I got started.

Unfortunately, I discovered that this pattern makes small eyelets in the centers of the “cables.” This is bad when you have a Dad with hairy legs. Doh.

I know… let’s design our own sock! Why not, right?

Hmm… why not add real cables? What’s one more new method in your third knitting project ever?

The cables were my first downfall. A good friend (and yes, I still call her that after this) tried to convince me that cables are much easier if you “air cable.” Uh huh. Someone else, with thicker, more sproingy yarn maybe… me, not so much. I’d go to cable and ZOOOM! My stitch would vanish down the side of the sock and suddenly I’d go from a cabled sock to a Clapotis sock. ::grumbles::

So I frogged, cast on again, and started again. Rinse. Repeat. Twice. Why yes, I’m stubborn, how do you think I survived Biochemistry?

So I finally gave in and went back to the cable needle. Slower, but I didn’t lose stitches. Hurray.

But then… then… without warning, doom struck. I started… to spin. Like spin a lot. The bug hit, and hit hard. Why knit in the evenings when my brain could take off in wild flights of fancy making yarns?

And so, this poor sock, started in June, has only just been finished. Note that I said sock. Singular. Yes. It’s taken me from June until now to finish a single sock. Blame spinning. It is evil and addicting.

So, the sock. It’s an ankle sock because that’s what Dad likes. It has four 4×4x8 cables (4 stitches wide, cross every four, then eight rows) that are inset in the surface of the sock (in a field of knit, rather than purl stitches) so they won’t press on Dad’s shoe too badly. This makes them less obvious, but I’m ok with that.

Toe up, short row heel, 1×1 rib for the ankle. Sewn bind off (thanks to EZ) which isn’t the most even ’cause it was my first.

Dad's Sock

Dad's Sock


Detail of Dad's Sock

Detail of Dad's Sock

Hopefully, with the other things I have to get done, I can finish the second sock in time for the holidays. Or Dad’s going to have one cold foot. His shoe is off, his foot is cold, he has a bird he likes to hold… or that likes to play with his moccasins, I can never remember.

Anyway, this is why…

Mommas, don’t let your babies grow up to be spinners.

They’ll never finish your socks.

Fiber update post soon. I’ve got some new pretty stuff.

~The Gnome
Gnome

Category: Knitting  | Tags: ,  | 2 Comments
Friday, November 14th, 2008 | Author: The Gnome

Right, so yesterday I told you why your red turns to glop and your yellow won’t dissolve.

Which, of course, left you saying, “Well that’s great, but now what?”

Ah, now what? Now we discuss solutions.

The “easy” thing to do, would be to replace the water. Because water doesn’t get along with our yellow (and to a lesser extent, the red), because magnets like magnets, and our yellow… well it isn’t a magnet.

So, what would be easiest would be to make the solution the dye is dissolved in also be a not-magnet, balanced, hydrophobic (water hating) molecule. Unfortunately, hydrophobic solvents are generally highly caustic and thus not available. Things like… phenol and formaldehyde and benzene (Benzene is just those rings I showed you yesterday).

Ew. Even if your average dyer could get those chemicals, you wouldn’t really want your yarn/fiber soaked in gas, or flesh dissolving goop. Neither would these chemicals play nice with your green and blue dyes, which are hydrophillic magnet molecules.

So, we can’t replace the solvent (what the dye is dissolved in), and we can’t change the dye itself (since then it wouldn’t be yellow anymore). What can we change?

The answer is, anything that doesn’t affect the dyeing chemistry itself. Which means we can add quite a bit of stuff to our dyepot without screwing up the dye.

The most straightforward things to add are things which will interact with both hydrophillic magnet molecules and non-magnet hydrophobic molecules. So, molecules which have a balanced end and an unbalanced end.

These fall into two classes: Detergents and Humectants

Detergents. Detergents are molecules which have a hydrophillic “head” and a hydrophobic “tail.” Your laundry “detergent” is a detergent (in the chemical sense). And the way it works is by forming little groups around your hydrophobic dirt particles, tails (non-magnet ends) pointed in at the dirt, and heads (magnet ends) pointed out at the water. This lets you wash the dirt off with water.

“Soaps” are a specific kind of detergent scientifically called “surfactants” or “surface active detergents” because they have a higher than normal ability to wrap all the way around those little hydrophobic dirt particles, even if that means pulling them off a surface (you, your clothes, etc).

So, you might be able to add some detergent to your dye bath to help the yellow go into solution. The problem is that most commonly available detergents are soaps, which means they are really good at sequestering things (wrapping all around and not letting it touch anything) which can inhibit your dye’s ability to, well… dye. So, go ahead and add a little detergent (the naturally less foamy your detergent the more likely that it will help) but it may or may not solve the problem.

Humectants. These are similar in overall structure to your detergents. They have a hydrophillic and a hydrophobic end, just like detergents. The difference is that their hydrophillic end is REALLY hydrophillic. They don’t just get along with water, they actually hold onto it. The other difference is that your humectants are less able to gang up and “wrap around” hydrophobic molecules, so they won’t stop your dye from interacting with things. Basically, they can make believe that your hydrophobic molecule actually likes water. This is why they’re often called “wetting agents.” (Humectant, from the same root as “humid”)

These are overall a better choice than the detergents, and are fairly readily available. Glycerol and urea are the two most common ones. Urea is generally cheaper, but smells funny and in very large amounts can screw with things. Glycerol is a little gunkier to deal with but doesn’t interact with just about anything (beyond the aforementioned humectant property).

Salts. If you have especially soft water (lacking in calcium and magnesium) then a small addition of salt can help to increase the disorder in your solution, but it’s not likely to help a great deal unless your water is REALLY soft (if you scrub forever in the shower and that detergent never comes off you, same reason).

The short answer:
So, if you’re having trouble with crashing or goopification, try adding a little detergent. If that doesn’t work, try adding urea or glycerol.

Or, use the tried and true method of increasing your free energy and system entropy… put it back on the stove or in the microwave, and heat it up again!

And yes, for those of you wondering, I will post about non-science stuff. Maybe even tomorrow. I might even talk about… knitting! Or you know, that spinning stuff I do!

~The Gnome
gnome

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: , ,  | 2 Comments
Thursday, November 13th, 2008 | Author: The Gnome

The Gnome is a nerd. Yep. I don’t research because I have to, I have to research.

Someone on Ravelry asked a question about dyes (not an uncommon occurrence in a dyeing group). Specifically, it was a question about why acid dyeing yellow is a pain in the butt and falls out of solution.

Now, most people would satisfy themselves with something to the effect of, “It’s a yellow thing” or even a “It’s a chemistry thing.” But not me, oh no, none of that simple answer for THIS gnome!

You see, I am one of those freaks you might have known in college. Remember how all the bio and chem majors would always moan about this horrible class they had? A class who’s horror reached almost mythic proportions, a monolith almost insurmountable? That class was called, “Orgo” short for “Organic Chemistry.” And I was that kid, yeah, That Kid. The one who loved it. Even when I was failing it, I found it fascinating.

So when someone asked, “Why does my yellow dye always fall out of solution as soon as its cool?” I started researching (in my spare moments when I wasn’t dunking my yeast in formaldehyde). And you know what? I came up with some answers! Huzzah!

So, you probably want to know what the answer is, don’t you? Well, I’ll tell you. I’m going to try to write this such that it goes from the simplest explanation to the most complete explanation, so you can read as far as you want and not be overwhelmed. Because the truth is, most people don’t care about the in depth chemistry. But for those who do, I’ll try to explain things in non-jargoned terms (or explain the jargon at least).

Question: Why does my yellow dye fall out of solution when cool?
Corollary Question: Why do some of my red dyes form “jello” when cooler?

Most basic answer: Because your yellow dye hates water
Most basic corollary answer: Because your red dye likes itself

More in-depth answer: Chemistry.

One of the most basic divisions of chemicals is between those that love water, called “hydrophillic” (meaning, literally, “loves water”), and those that hate water, called “hydrophobic” (meaning “fears water”).

Example: Oil is hydrophobic. That’s why it makes little bubbles when you mix it with water.

Your yellow dyes are “hydrophobic,” thus the most basic answer.

Hydrophobicity, the “amount” a molecule hates water, is controlled by how “balanced” a molecule is. Think of an unbalanced, water loving molecule like a magnet. If a molecule is not balanced, its exactly like a magnet, with two ends or “poles.” Those poles can attract other unbalanced magnets. Strong magnets are all about getting together with other strong magnets. They have fun molecule parties. If the magnets are strong enough… well you can’t pull those magnets back apart again!

So the trick is that the balanced molecules don’t get along with the unbalanced ones. All those magnet molecules want to cluster together, so they can line up South poles near North poles and balance each other out, right? But the balanced molecules don’t have any poles, so any magnet nearby doesn’t have anything to balance it out.

This makes the magnets cranky.

So the magnet molecules all get together and line up end to end around the non-magnet molecules and make itty bitty bubbles around them, ostracizing them from the party. Bam, you’ve got bubbles of oil! (or yellow dye). If all those water molecules get really lined up (ordered) then you get… ice! Ice is highly ordered water.

I can hear you now, “So wait, if my dye hates water, why does it ever go into solution? And why doesn’t my blue dye do that too?”

Quick answer: ‘Cause your dye isn’t as hydrophobic (water hating) as oil, and not all dyes were created equal.

When you heat up your water, all those magnets get hyper (think steam!). When they’re bouncing around, they don’t line up very well (the ice melts) and so they can’t ostracize those non-magnet dye particles as well, and the little bubbles burst and your dye dissolves into solution, until it cools down again and falls out.

But why doesn’t it happen to your blue dye? Why is yellow the worst?

Here comes the chemistry. Ooh scary. Nope, not really. Just gonna show you some pretty pictures and point at things.

Here is the core of a yellow acid dye. This is called a “trityl” group.
Yellow Trityl

See those hexagons with the little double lines? Those are very hydrophobic. They really don’t get along with water well, because they’re very very balanced. There’s some little bits hanging off that aren’t shown here, which make it kinda go into water if you heat it, but not enough to make it stay there.

Here’s another yellow acid dye
Yellow Azo

Again, see those rings? Hydrophobic. The little bits hanging off the two ends are what make it yellow (by changing the way it interacts with light). Like before, they make it able to go into water, but not well.

“But wait, if this is what my dye looks like, why doesn’t the green do this? Or the blue? If green is blue and yellow, why doesn’t the yellow part fall out?”

Ah, right. Green. The answer is, depends on the green. Some greens are mixed blue and yellow, but some are “pure” greens, that is the dye itself is green. Pure greens are similar to yellow, but with bigger hydrophillic water friendly groups.

Green

See those big hanging off bits (moieties)? Those make this pure green dye a lot more water friendly than it’s yellow cousin. You can also see how the big rings aren’t as evenly spaced as in the yellow example. This lets water into that center space, again making it more soluble.

“Ok, but what about my corollary question? Why the heck is my red making jello?”

Right, the jello. Ok, we’re going to go back to that second yellow dye
Yellow

Remember? Now, reds are made from a similar base, but the big water-hating rings are a little further apart, which lets water in between (like that twist in the green dye), but also the way they make them red, and not yellow, is by adding big doo-dads on the two ends (where the HO- is and on the far end).

These moieties (doo-dads) make the whole molecule unbalanced enough to interact with the water. But in some cases, if the end magnets are strong and the middle part water hating, your red can line up in big long strings, end to end, making balanced ropes with water hating middles! This lining up is called “polymerization” and is exactly what happens in jello, and is similar to the ordering of ice. Warming up the solution makes the magnets hyper again and things move around and your red goes back into solution.

So, that’s why your yellow falls out of solution and your red sometimes makes jello.

~The Gnome
gnome

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: , ,  | 8 Comments
Tuesday, November 11th, 2008 | Author: The Gnome

Lest you think that in between postings and panicking about failing research the Gnome actually sits and rests… let me explain a little known fact about gnome physiology.

You see, gnomes are like suns. We are actually hyper dense matter. So, we have to run around like crazy all the time, putting out large amounts of energy, because if we don’t, we will collapse like a dying sun and become little gnome blackholes. So, no resting for the Gnome, unless you want me to become a little vortex.

Here’s what I’ve been doing lately. First, a new yarn, “Lichen” a super soft two-ply merino/alpaca blend I spun for a hat/scarf commission.

Lichen Skeined

Next, I did a bunch of dyeing of silk roving. Here they are, silk roving for “Amaterasu,” “Dionysus,” and “Anubis.”

New Roving

I’m also working on two more with two new dyeing techniques. New techniques also mean, of course, a learning curve. Here’s a technique I haven’t quite mastered yet. Ignore the poor photography.

Roving Experiment

~The Gnome
gnome

Category: Yarn Update  | Tags: , , ,  | 3 Comments