I have dyeing to put up, I have a surprise I want to put up, I have… stuff. But paper, thesis, etc. are swamping, so they come first.

So, a final report from Special Operative Gnome:

Goals met:
I did my mile, an even mile of singles and about a third of a mile plied 3-ply.
I spun my mile entirely in long draw, which I’d never done more than a few feet of before.
I spun every day, despite a trip, the paper, airplane flights, and no focus/energy.
I finished the polwarth silk bobbin
I got the hang of drafting tussah silk from the tip (on a spindle)
I managed a full 2oz spindle cop, twice the weight of the spindle, and larger around than the spindle.
I spun at 30-thousand feet
I spun on a boat
I spun walking around a Scottish festival.
I learned long draw well enough to (while still terrified I’ll fuck it up) actually start an important project with it.

I’m claiming this event a success for sucking less (the purpose of Team Suck Less). Especially considering what I had going on in the background.

Totals:
482yds 3-ply long draw BFL + 300+ yds longdraw BFL singles ~1 lb
1157 yds short backwards draw polwarth silk at 3700 ypp =5oz
Tussah Silk Spindle spun less than 1oz
BFL laceweight spindle spun less than 1oz
Cormo/Alpaca/Angora spindle spun =2oz
Tsock Batt longdraw less than 1oz

So somewhere over 2 miles. About a pound and a half of fiber. I actually dyed one of the skeins from my mile. It fluffs up beautifully but I didn’t take a photo before it got mailed out, so I may not have a photo of the dyed skein in time.

I’ve done a little more on the BFL (at the bottom) but I left it at my parents, so no photo. Doh.

On the last day, I got together with Marcy and Lynn for an excellent day of spinning and laughing and fiber… (image ganked from Lynn)

I’ll have more new content soon, I promise. Just have to get this paper out, get my dissertation started, clean the house, get the fruit fly infestation taken care of, and start applying for jobs. No problem.

::grins::

~The Gnome

Now, a break from hardcore chemistry…

When I wasn’t stuck in lab this weekend, I went home to visit my parents. I always enjoy visiting my parents, it’s relaxing and… good.

This weekend we went to the local Scottish Festival in Northampton. It was a lot of fun. I got to wear my kilt, eat bridie, listen to good music, and relax in the sun. Very nice.

I do admit that I laughed a little at what looked like a “historical reenactment” tent they had. There was woman making yarn on a colossal, unbalanced, rough as heck, top whorl spindle, and all I could think was, “That would be a lot easier if you flipped it over and used it as a bottom whorl.” I mean we’re talking a whorl that was 5 inches across and almost two inches deep, roughly hexagonal with a dowel the size of your thumb. But she was making yarn with it (albeit very slowly because as a top whorl she had to respin it every few seconds).

But that’s not actually what made me laugh. What mad me laugh was that next to this woman with the painfully “historic” spindle, was a woman… knitting. Um… no? Knitting is not that old. Later, the spindle spinner was weaving, on what looked to be a tapestry style loom. Which seemed an odd choice with the massive thick-thin yarn she was spinning, but… to each their own on that count, I don’t know enough about weaving to know if that was silly or not.

Anyway, it was a blast. We watched some of the highland games too. I like those. The smallest guy (not that much larger than me) came in second at the caber toss, and was one of only two guys who flipped the second caber. Only one flipped the third one. I like that the women compete with exactly the same cabers and weights as the guys. Watching them throw the weight up and over their head was fun too.

For most of the festival, I had my kilt and a normal t-shirt, and my cowboy hat to keep the sun off my head. Late in the festival, my parents bought me the totally awesome belt.

For those of you who object to the culture mixing there…

To go with the awesome belt, they also bought me this awesome gillie shirt, which fits well and is really comfy.

Yes, I realize all three are similar poses. I was tired, what can I say?

And for those wondering, here’s a closeup of the belt. They’re two separate pieces, and I picked them to coordinate. I’m really happy with them.

And of course, since I was walking around, I also spindle spun…

This is BFL top from a lovely fleece sampler from the Spinning Loft spun on my Greensleeves Damsel Monique. I’m not a huge fan of this plan as a walking spindle. I generally prefer to walk with a lighter yarn on a heavier longer spinning spindle. That said, I didn’t have any troubles at all, so I can’t complain.

Brief TDF update… I’ve managed the “spin every day” goal, but haven’t been making a lot of progress on that. Some progress on the knitting project. Brain has no focus.

The rest of the weekend was spent in lab, and this week has been constant lab…

But it’s been worth it. I finally have all of my figures done. And an abstract written (but unedited), the introduction and results are going through their last edits now. Whee! We’re actually getting there. I’ll probably be starting to write my thesis next week.

Yay.

~The Gnome

I have a weekend update to do, and some fiber to get up, but my brain is in chemistry mode right now, so I’m going to post about that instead.

So, there are a lot of dyes out there in the world, made by a lot of different companies.

The most common kinds you will run into are as follows:

Acid Dyes

Reactive Dyes

Direct Dyes

There are subclasses of most of these, and some crossovers. I’ll also briefly touch on a group called “Disperse Dyes.”

Ok. So, the difference between each of these classes of dye is in the way they interact with the fiber you’re dyeing. That is, they have a different chemistry. No, not scary! Get back here! I’m going to explain things logically and slowly, and if you have questions, feel free to ask them. I’ll try not to overwhelm you with jargon without explanation.

I’m going to go through them from one end of the chemical spectrum to the other, starting with my favorites, acid dyes.

Acid Dyes:

First, what does this group include? Some of the things you’re probably familiar with…

Kool Aid
Most food dyes, especially reds

and some you’re likely less familiar with…

Jacquard Acid Dyes
Prochem Washfast Dyes
Greener Shades Dyes

And more! But they all work via a similar chemical mechanism.

I’ve posted about acid dyes before, but I’ll duplicate some of it here.

First, the “acid” in “acid dyes” refers not to the dyes themselves, but to the environment they bind in. For kool aid, the acid is already present in the mix (in the form of citric acid crystals), for other dyes, it’s added as vinegar (which is acetic acid) or sometimes citric acid.

Safety Sidenote: Both acetic and citric acid are food acids, that is, they’re not terribly toxic and won’t kill you. However, when dealing with concentrated citric acid, or any hot bath with acid in it, be careful. Inhaling large amounts of vinegar steam can irritate your throat and lungs and eyes. Submerging your hands in these acids for any length of time can cause irritation and some skin peeling. Better safe than sorry.

Now, some acid dye chemistry!

Acid dyes work via a combination of interactions with the fiber. I’ll explain each one.

Primary: Ionic bonding
Secondary: van der Waals, Hydrogen bonding

Ionic bonding is a bonding between different charges on two molecules. Imagine acid dyes like little magnets. Remember how if you put two magnets together, you have to put the S and N ends together, or they’re push instead of pull together? Some molecules work the same way.

van der Waals interactions are like mini ionic interactions. Instead of a whole magnetic pole interaction, it’s a tiny fraction of one. But they add up.

Hydrogen bond interactions are weaker than ionic and stronger than van der Waals interactions, but use the same idea but specifically involving hydrogen.

Acid dyes are “anionic” meaning they have one full negative charge, think of it as one “south” magnet end.

Acid dyes can therefor bind to fibers which are “cationic” meaning they have one full positive charge, or one “north” magnet end.

An acid dye binds, like a magnet, when its “south” end binds to a fiber’s “north.”

There are many different ways to build an acid dye to get this “south” magnet effect. Some are strong, and some are weak. Here are a few examples.

You’ll notice that in all of these examples, an SO3 group (or two) is present. This is the “south pole” for these dyes. The rings are what gives it color.

Acid Orange, many reds and oranges are shaped like this.

Acid Green, many if not most greens are shaped like this. Some purples and blues as well.

Acid Blue, this overall elongated structure is what a lot of the “leveling” dyes use.

A “leveling” dye, is a dye which naturally makes for a more even color coating. The way this is done is by making a dye molecule with weaker binding potential (a weaker south pole) so that molecules can bind and unbind to move about the fiber evenly. This is convenient, but the trade-off is that the dyes can come off the fiber even when you don’t want them to. This is annoying if you want to wash your fiber in warm or hot water.

Another concern that many have with acid dyes is that to get the deeper and intense colors, especially blues, many of them are made with metal ions…

For example, here’s ProChem’s black dye, acid black. It’s a “true black” or “primary black” meaning that it’s not blended. But the intensity of color comes from that “Cr” in the middle of the molecule, which is a Chromium atom. Chromium is a heavy metal, which makes this a dye you don’t want to pour into your groundwater.

(You’ll notice this dye, as well, uses the “sulfonate” SO3 group as its ion, but also has a “nitro” NO2 group as well)

As a rule, companies try to limit the amounts of these heavy metals they need to use, and some companies like Greener Shades try to eliminate them altogether. However, some colors are hard to get without the use of metals.

So, in short…

Acid dyes are anionic (south pole) dyes, which use heat and an acidic environment to form ionic bonds with fiber.

Direct Dyes:

Dyes in this category are…

Cushings Direct Dyes
Jacquard iDye Direct Dyes
ProChem’s Diazol Direct Dyes, now sold by Aljo Mfg.
Any “universal” dye like RIT will have a Direct Dye as one of the two components

Direct dyes also use a combination of forces to bind to fiber…

Primary: van der Waals
Secondary: Hydrogen bonding

You can see already, that in some ways they’re similar to acid dyes, but their primary binding mode utilizes a much weaker interaction. Still, they bind similarly to similar fibers.

Direct dyes tend to be very large in order to have more “subtantivity.” This means having more surface area to contact the fiber and engage in more of these small van der Waals interactions.

Many if not most of the direct dyes will function as acid dyes as well. Look at this Direct Red dye and you’ll see why…

See that SO3 group? Yep, acid dyeing group. The problem with these dyes is that being as long as they are, and generally more balanced along their length, they again are easier to dislodge. You’ll notice it looks almost identical to the “leveling” category of dyes, that’s because… the classes overlap! More on what this means when I get to fiber chemistry in the next Dyeing 101 post.

You’ll also notice there’s more H’s hanging off, hydrogens that can be used in hydrogen bonds to stick this dye to fiber that doesn’t have that “north pole” that the acid binding group (the SO3) needs.

Since these dyes rely generally on weaker interactions, they are less washfast and lightfast than most acid and reactive dyes. Being big and floppy, they also tend to be duller in color (though this trait is not uniform). The advantage of them is that they don’t require fiber with positive “north pole” groups.

So, direct dyes in brief…

Use some ionic, but mostly hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces to bind to fiber. Less wash and lightfast than reactive or acid dyes, but better leveling and don’t require cationic “north pole” groups to bind.

Reactive dyes:

Dyes in this category…

Procion MX
Dylon Cold
Lanaset/Sabraset
Cibacron F
Prochem Sabracron F
Remazol
Vinyl Sulfone

Reactive dyes us primarily a singular mode of binding, though most can use another as well.

Primary: Covalent bonds
Secondary: As acid dyes

Covalent bonds are what you think of when you think of molecules. “Actual” bonds. The kind that hold the H-O-H of water together. Those little lines in all these diagrams are covalent bonds.

Covalent bonds are the strongest bonds, as such reactive dyes are the toughest when it comes to being washfast.

I wish there was a better picture of this, but here’s a common reactive dye molecule…

The first thing you might notice is those SO3 groups. That’s what makes this able to function as an acid dye if you add vinegar.

But here’s the important part of the molecule, over there on the left…

Funny looking bit, isn’t it? Chlorines (note that when on the dye, one chlorine is replaces with the dye)? Negative charges? Those chlorines would really like to rip a hydrogen off of your fiber and float off happily as HCl (Hydrochloric acid), but that would leave that ring behind it bare! But wait, whatever is behind the H the Cl ripped off is ALSO bare, usually an O or an N (Oxygen or Nitrogen) so the two bare things can interact and form a new covalent bond, yay!

That means when the process is done, you have a dye molecule that is actually PART of your fiber molecule, pretty cool? And depending how those interaction groups are designed, they can react with all SORTS of things. Neat. The highly basic environment most reactive dyeing is performed in is to make this process easier, similar in reverse to why acid dyes are done in an acidic environment.

So, an overview of reactive dyes…

Covalently bonded to oxygens and nitrogens on the fiber, making them ultimately washfast. Lightfasteness varies with the structure of the dye molecule.

Disperse Dyes:

Disperse dyes are horrible and gross. They’re what you have to use to dye polyester and acrylic and similar plastics. Ok, that’s not all true. There are ways to dye polyester without having to use the noxious chemicals and super heat, Jacquard has dyes for it. But they’re still not pleasant dyes. I’m not going to talk about the chemistry of these.

Brief overview for those who want the differences quick:

Acid Dyes: Anionic (negative), bind to cationic (positive) fibers. Can’t bind nonionic fibers. Fairly washfast, pretty lightfast.

Direct Dyes: Often anionic (negative) binds to nonionic fibers, and if anionic then it can bind cationic fibers as an acid dye. Not very washfast or lightfast. Many can be used as weak acid dyes. A component in “universal” dyes like RIT

Reactive Dyes: Covalent interactors, often with anionic (negative) bits as well. Given the right environment can bind covalently to nonionic fiber, and possibly to cationic fiber. Many can also function as acid dyes on cationic fiber.

Now, I’m sure by now you’re waiting for me to tell you WHAT fibers are cationic, and what fibers are nonionic. You might be wondering if there’s anionic fibers too. We’ll get to that, but not in this post. That’s in the next post. Cellulose, protein, animal, plant, extruded?

::waves:: As I said above, feel free to ask questions, clarify, or even argue with my chemistry.

Answers to Questions:

To Velma: By wandering around the web a lot. Here’s what I can tell you about ProChem’s stuff…

Sun Yellow, Basic Red, Bright Blue Red, Turqoise, Bright Blue, and National Blue are all non-metallic. Carbon Black (Acid Black 52) is the chromium containing one. Here’s a link which has some minimal information. As a rule, if you Google either the systematic name or the Color Index name, you can find the structures of things. So for example… Acid Yellow 17 Sigma can be a good place to find these.

To Krissy: Usually, that’s how those fibers are dyed, from what I understand. They’re colored in the vat, before extrusion.

Kellie: Feel free to link away. And anyone who comes here from there can also feel free to ask questions or make comments.

Diane: An ionic bond is like a magnet. It can only occur between two things which are magnetizable (or in the case of ionic bonds, things which have charge). So, like you can’t stick a magnet to plastic, you can’t stick an ionic compound to a non-ionic one.

David: The next big post in this series will cover the basic difference between fibers, animal, plant, and others.

~The Gnome

Fiber.

Brain melting. So there won’t be much with this beyond the fiber. Couple of things in the works, which I’ll let you know about soon. But the push for the paper is on, so that’s… eating my life and my sleep.

As summer passes, and Persephone’s time on earth comes to a close, Demeter starts to weep, and the soft yellow wheat begins to ripen, turning the fields to gold…

Demeter – 1oz x 4 – Combed Tussah Silk Top

Brilliant colors, red, blue, purple, and gold, explode in incandescent flowers in the sky, bright and saturated. This was going to be Spanish Shawl, named after the nudibranch of the same name. But the colors didn’t cooperate quite right. So it’s fireworks.

Fireworks – 4oz – Combed Finn Top

The sun rises, in soft redgold, pink, and rose, setting the world afire with new possibility

Sunrise – 4oz – Combed Finn Top

And that’s it for now. Something pretty cool upcoming. Need sleep.

~The Gnome

The challenge for team Suck Less, our equivalent of the mountain day in the “real” TDF, was to spin a mile.

Now, ideally, I would have spun a mile of completed yarn. But that wasn’t going to happen because the only projects I have for singles yarn are weaving, and I need to be more careful than I could be when speed spinning for those. And the chance of my spinning a mile of plied yarn, not so high.

Saturday, I set out to see how far I could get. I sat down at Strider with some lovely open BFL top that I had, and started to spin. Now, normally, most people don’t longdraw from a top prep, but I don’t currently have any roving or batts that I was willing to sacrifice for as speed spinning day. So… I worked from top, which was a learning experience. Especially so, since I’ve never spun much true longdraw before.

It took me one false start and 3:10 to get the first bobbin done. The second bobbin was 2:50, and the third 2:15. Which gave me three full bobbins, and some short breaks for eating, stretching, and drinking.

I started to ply and quickly realized I was having take-up problems with Strider. He just didn’t want to wind on the yarn. I had noticed a little during the initial spinning, but it hadn’t been a problem since doing longdraw I didn’t want much take-up. But I didn’t have time to mess around with it much, so I needed tension on my lazy kate.

So, being a budding Ph.D. as I am, I came up with a highly technical solution…

That’s a computer case. It worked pretty well, but didn’t catch all the bobbins, so the middle one still spun and caused me some issues (the singles from that one liked to make their own little supercoils that then plied in. Ugh).

So, 14 hours from start I had this…

482 yards of three-ply BFL (one of the small skeins is navajo plied).

I also spun an extra 320 yrd bobbin of singles yarn, putting me over the mile mark of singles. And if you include the plying, then I’m 500 yards more over. Woot.

So, I spun a mile of singles, and plied 500 yds of yarn in 14 hours. Not bad. I’m going to say that, at least for me, that qualifies as “Sucking Less.” Though I don’t think I’ll be putting up most of this yarn for sale, as I’m not terribly happy with it. I think I can now use longdraw to make salable yarn, so that’s also a success.

I’ve got some fiber to put up, will get that up tomorrow for everyone. Back to the paper.

~The Gnome